AN WARS vs SODOMY ! PART 2

Ever since news of DSAI`s sodomising the young man in blue shirt was posted all over intrnet as well other media sources I have been asked by many friends, neighbours, mamak stall, mak cik nasi lemak seller, insurance men, bankers, security guards etc....the million dollar question i.e : Whether DSAI does indulge in such practice viz a viz homosexual activities?
I must confess I do not know. I say this because I was never there when it happened or if it ever did happened. However, we should give him the benefit of the doubt and let the police do their professional job and if possible, co-operate with the police so that a thorough investigation could be completed as soon as possible.
Incidentally, I would like to refer to the judgement of the learned Tun Abdul Hamid Mohamid, Federal Court Judge, who delivered the majority decision of the Federal Court in the case of Dato` Seri Anwar Ibrahim v PP [2004] 3 CLJ 737 at p.788:
" To summarise our judgment, even though reading the appeal record, we find evidence to confirm that the appellants( DSAI) were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen....as a court of law, we may only convict the appellants if the prosecution has successfully proved the alleged offences as stated in the charges beyond reasonable doubt, on admissible evidence and in accordance with established principles of law.......while the testimonies of Dr.Mohd Fadzil and Tun Haniff and the conduct of the first appellant(DSAI) confirm the appellants` involvement in homosexual activities, such evidence does not corroborate Azizan`s story that he was sodomised by both the appellants at the place,time and date specified in the charge.In the absence of the corroborative evidence it is unsafe to convict the appellants on the evidence of an accomplice alone unless his evidence is unusually convincing or for some reason is of special weight which we find it is not.."

There you are. The Federal Court Judges all agreed that DSAI and the other persons did have homosexual activities. However the learned judges found that there was not enough evidence to establish the allegation that the victim (Azizan) was sodomised ( anal sex against his will/consent) by the appellants (DSAI and another). The court had decided that Azizan was an accomplice and therefore his testimonies requires corroboration (support of convioncing nature) in order to secure a conviction. Since there was no corroboration thus the court could not convict DSAI and had to acquit him.

Based on the above, we can safely simplify our undertanding in plain and simple language as such:
1) Was Anwar involved in homosexual activities then? Answer: Yes.

2) Did Anwar sodomised Azizan(the victim) ? Answer: No.

Having read the above, what do you think of the latest allegation of sodomy against DSAI ?

SELAMAT BERFIKIR!