ITU LAH HAKIKATNYA....aku serahkan jiwa dan raga....sanggup hidup di risiko...asal...penuh bergaya.......
Peribahasa Melayau ada menyebut: Ibarat telur dihujung tanduk... begitulah ibarat kehidupan masyarakat mewah di Bukit Anatrabangsa. masing-masing berlumba-lumba membina rumah kediaman yang canggih dan indah mata memandang Terutamanya mata tuan rumah itu sendiri.
Siapa lah yang tak inginkan kediaman yang tersergam indah dan menjadi bualan harian rakyat jelata dan hiasan majallah-majalah hartanah di Malaysia viz a viz the rich and famous of Malaysia. an address that one is willing TO DIE For!
Well can I say. they knew there was a risk. they new there calls top freeze hiilsides construction years...ago since Highland Towers... but do they listen?????yes they do..then they quietly selectively forget.
all the victims have our deepest sympathty.....we are on ly human..our thoughts and pryers with all of them..
I pray TO THE ALL MIGHTY ALLAH MAY THESE PEOPLE NOT FORGET THE ERROR HUMAN NATURE CAUSED MAY BE FATAL TO THEMSELVES AND GENERATIONS TO COME.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
SUSAH SUSAH ORANG SENANG: TANAH RUNTUH DI BUKIT ANTARABANGSA-SURATAN ATAU KEBETULAN????
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
HINDRAF: SEBUAH PERTUBUHAN HARAM/AN UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION
H.indu R.ights A.ction F.orce = HINDRAF ADALAH SINGKATAN NAMA SEBUAH PERTUBUHAN YANG DIANGGOTAI OLEH ORANG BERAGAMA HINDU. Tujuan penubuhan pertubuhan iini adalah di luar pengetahuan saya. Tetapi apa yang menjadi usah utam mereka sekarang nampaknya adalh bagi mendapatkan pembebesan ahli Hindraf yang sedang di tahan bawah ISA. Mereka juga sedang berkempen supaya ISA di mansuhkan.
Pertubuhan INI ADALAH SEBUAH PERTUBUHAN YANG TIDAK BERDAFTAR DENGAN MANA-MANA PIHAK BERKUASA DI MALAYSIA. LANTARAN ITU, IA ADALAH SEBUAH PERTUBUHAN haram!!!!!!
Perkara 10 Perlembagaan Persekutuan 1957, kebebasan berpersatuan hendaklah tertakluk kepada undang-undang lain yang sedang berkuatkuasa. Dalam konteks ini Akta Pertubuhan 1966( Akta 335). Maka jika ia tidak berdaftar , pertubuhan itu adalh tidak wujud dan tidak diiktiraf kewujudannya disisi undang-undang. Jika ter5us juga beroperasi sebagai sebuah pertubuhan ia adalahsuatu kesalahn jenayah dan boleh ditangkap /didakwa.
Ringkasnya, HINDRAF adalh sebuah pertubuhan haram dan menjalanbkan aktiviti-aktiviti secara haram yang melanggar semua peruntukan undang-undang negara kita. Kerajaan kita tak wajib memberi layanan apa pun kepada mereka.
Malah, saya amat terperanjat apabila pemimpin mereka pergi ke Balai Polis di Perak untuk buat lapoprtan polis terhada Dato` Seri Syed Hamid albar, Menteri KDN, tempoh hari pihak polis lansung tidak menagkap mereka.
Sepatutnya polis tangkap saje pemimpin mereka itu kerana berkumpul lebih daripada tiga orang di tempat awam tanpa kebenaran Polis adalah perkumpulan haram dan boleh ditankap!!!!!! didakwa!!!!!!!
TAK PERLU GUNA ISA. TANGKAP SAJE GUNA AKTA POLIS dan terus dakwa bawah S.27 dan 28 akta Polis 1967
Sunday, September 14, 2008
INTERNAL SECURITY ACT! BRAVO TO THE POLICE
ALHAMDULILLAH, finally the PDRM has decided to invoke the ISA to preempt such action by some quarters of our society who may have resulted in racial riot in the entire country as in 1969.
Why are we so afraid of the ISA ? It is a piece of legislation specially made for maintaing law and order in the country to strike at individuals or a group of individuals who, through their conduct ,may result in undermining the security and stability of the country.
The USA has the PATRIOT Act aimed at terrorists groups or their related groups or associate whose actions are suspicious of underminingt he security of the USA.
In UK they have the Anti Terrorim Act( Amendment 2007) also aimed at terrorists and their associate whose activies may undermine the security of the country, ( UK )
In all the above pieces of legislations, which were made legally, in accordance with the normal process of the law and procedure are designed to maintain law and order of the country and with the welfare of its citizen at heart.
ISA is a special piece of legislation as opposed to the ordinary penal legislations being administered in the country. Its objective is to strike at the source of the problem before it could begin to spread and cause more damage and carnage. In other words, it "nip it in the bud" what ever actions which are deemed sucpiciously dangerous to the safety of the country and its people.
Due to its nature, ISA is not invoked sparingly. It is rarely used.It is only invoked in circumstances that really calls for a swift and potent action to quell any signs of subversion of our nation`s security and economy.
Yes, we do have Sedition Act and Defamation Act and Penal Code which are also Penal in nature. However, the actions and conduct of some quarters in Malaysia of late cannot be adequately dealt with the ordianbry way as they also act in a most extraodinarily. We cannot afford to sit on our laurels and wait for trouble turns into anarchy and propelled into magnanimous revulsion of chaos that will disrtupt the ectire security and economu of the nation. It would be ashame if that happen given the fact that we have had a glorious 50 years of magical formula in maintaning peace harmony .
We are now in the first year of the second phase of the next 50 years after our independence in 1957. We should not let anything compromise what we have successfully achieved collectively.
Outsiders are always jealous of the secret of our young nation`s success in maitianing such harmony and prosperity in a nation with variety of ethnicity. What is happening now is a classic exmaple of outside intervention using their proxy within our country. We should always be vigilant and sensitive to outside intervention. We should also not be easily swayed by certain quarters serenading empty promises for a better leadership dan governance. We might end up worst than the good life that we are enjoying now.
So dont be easily clouded by the smoke screen orchesstrated and pre-arranged by some unpatritotic group of people.
Friday, September 5, 2008
LIES! LIARS ! CHEATS! TIPU! PENIPU! PENDUSTA!
Maaf kepada pembaca blog saya kerana sudahlama tidak update blog ini. Tidak, sayamasihsihat dan bernyawa lagi. Cuma kesibukan beralih tempat kerja menyebabkan keadaan tidak mengizinkan. Saya kira belum terlambat untuk mengucapakan kepada semua kaum muslimin dan muslimat, Ramadhan kareem!
Dalam kesibukan itu pun sempat saya perasan mengenai beberapa isu negara yang semakin melampau dan diluar batasan keimanan untuk bersabar saj menerimanya.
Sekali lagi pembohongan dilakukan tanpa mengira nasib, perasaan, reputasi dan kebajikan orang dijadikan bahan fitnah dan pembohongantersebut.
Yes, ini berkaitan mengenai personalti yang terlibat dalam kes liwat terhadap Dato` Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Maaf, maksud saya YB DSAI dari Permatang Pauh yang juga Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat.
Ianya bukan mengenai DSAI sendirti atau bukan "mangsa liwat" Syaiful .
Ini adalah mengenai FITNAH DAN PEMBOHONGAN yang dirancang terhadqap Pegawai Khas Timbalan Perdana Menteri iaitu saudara Khairil Anas.
Saudara Ramlang Porigi, Imam Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan melalui artikel2 yang disiarkan dalam Suara Keadilan pada Bil 145(27.8.2008-9.8.2008); juga dalam akhbar Siasah Bil.0113(31.8.2008-6.9.2008) ; dan melalui rakaman video temuramah dalam Suara Keadilan Onl;ine yang dimuatkan pada 25 Ogoss 2008; telah menyatakan bahawa Saudara Khairil Anas mengenali Imam tersebut dan telah meminta nya menguruskan majlis lafaz sumpah Mohd. Saiful Bukhari Azlan.
Ini adalah suatu pembohongan dalam kapasiti mega besar-besaran terhadap Pegawai Khas TPM kita, Dato` Seri Najib Tun Razak. Mengapa dan kenapa????? Hanya yang empunya diri saja yang tahu jawapannya.
Saya katakan PEMBOHONGAN DAN FITNAH kerana pada tarikh majlis tersebut diadakan saudara Khairil Anas tidak berada di Kuala Lumpur, malah beliau telah bearada berada jauh di Penang menjalankan tugas pada 15 Ogos lagi iaitu tarikh majlis tersebut dijalankan.
Artikel berisi PEMBOHONGAN itu lengkap menyatakan saudara Khairil Anas sendiri yang berjumpa dengan Saudara Ramlang Porigi dan meminta beliau menguruskan majlis tersebut pada pagi 15 Ogos 2008.
Dakwaan Ramlang Porigi itu adalah amat mustahil kerana Sdr Khairil Anas tidak mungkin berada di dua tempat yang berasingan pada satu waktu yang sama kecuali.........
Kecuali Sdr. Khairil Anas ada bela hantu raya atau clone!!!!!!!!! Yang saya tahu beliau tak pernah pun ada bela hantu raya dan belum lagi cukup kemampuan nak beli clone dirinya.
Ini Ramlang Porigi tau ke yang PEMBOHONGAN yang dia buat itu tak betul lansung! Otang tua-tua dulu ada pesan, kalau nak mencuri belajar lah dari pencuri dan kalau nak jadi baik belajar lah dari orang yang baik-baik.
Saya cuma boleh bersimpati dengan Ramlang Porigi kerana terlalu percaya dengan dorongan dan janji palsu serta omongan kosong puak-puak yang menabur janji dan imbuhan kepada beliau.
Seorang Imam seperti Ramlang Porigi dengan mudah boleh melakukan pendustaan sebegini mega adalah menjadi suatu kebimbangan kepada kita semua. Ini saja telah cukup mencemarkan nama baik agama Islam dan institusi Imam dalam masyarakat di Malaysia yang berbilang kaum dan agama.
Bertaubatlah sebelum terlambat. Tak perlu bersumpah untuk menegakkan benang yang dah basah.
Kepada Sdr Khairil Anas saya doakan tuan banyaklah bersabar dan anggaplah ini semua sebahagian daripada dugaan dari Allah. Kerana Allah hanya menduga hambanya yang tahan dugaan. Saya doakan tuan sihat,fizikal dan mental serta teruskan perjuangan kita yang masih jauh lagi perjalananya.
Bersempena dengan bulan Ramadhan al Mubaraq ini saya berharap pihak yang berkenaan yang menaja dan membimbing PEMBOHONGAN DAN FITNAH dengan motif tersendiri, hentikanlah pendustaan ini.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
DNA, OH! DNA ! OH! DNA WHITHER ART THOU?
FOR THE PAST FEW DAYS THIS THREE LETTERS D . N. A have been taking centre stage in all our national newspapers and tabloids as well the electronic media. Everyone of us has been talking about it. Whether DSAI should or should not have voluntered to give his DNA, the advantages or disadvantages, the long and short of it all etc...
Just what is a DNA????DNA
DNA is an abbreviation from: Deoxyribonucleic acid.
It is a chromosomal double chain that exists in the nucleus of each living cell. DNA determines an individual's hereditary characteristics and can be used to distinguish and identify an individual from another person. This becomes critical when blood, hair, skin, or any other part of the body is used to prove one's involvement, or lack of involvement, in a crime scene.
Legal history proved that DNA tests have been used to release a convicted killer on death row who did not commit a crime, but debate continues over whether DNA evidence is scientifically certain enough to be admitted in trials. The current trend is to allow admission.
The debate currently in Malaysia in relation to the DSAI sodomy investigation viz. a viz allegation made pursuant to S.377 C, Penal Code is not the authoritativeness of the DNA but his reluctance to give consent to the taking of his DNA.
It should be noted that in so far as our evidence law is concerned, DNA is just another form of circumstantial evidence. Though it may be admissible in court as evidence, it is by no means conclusive proof so as to as render a conviction as to the guilt of the accused in a criminal trial.
Indeed the onus is very heavy on the prosecution relying on circumstantial evidence. Such evidence must point irressistibly to the guilt of the accused. If there are any gaps in it then it will not be sufficient. (PP v Lin Lian Chen [1992] 2 MLJ 561, Supreme Court)
So I really am puzzled why there are so much reluctance to volunter his DNA. Such evidence will still has to meet with other requirements of the law, as checks and abalance, to establish guilt especially in such sexual offence.
Thursday, July 17, 2008
DEBAT ANWAR vs AHMAD SAHBERY CHIK : SIAPA BENAR DAN SIAPA PUTAR
Debat ini yang pertama kali sepertinya dilakukan adalah suatu sejarah segar dan subur bagi demokrasi yang hidup dalam pentadbiran Barisan Nasional di bawah kepimpinan YAB Dato` Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Perdana Menteri kita.
Belum pernah lagi berlaku di Malaysia, kedua-dua pemimpin parti yang berbeza antara kerajaan dan pembangkang boleh berkongsi pentas yang sama dan berhujjah secara terhormat dan sungguh berhemah.
Ini menunjukkan bahawa tohmahan bahawa kerajaan BN aalah tidak perihatin dan kuku besi dalam menjalankan pentadbiran negara adalah tidak berasas sama sekali. Malahan jika kita lihat para penonton dalam dalam dewan tersebut pun dibahagikan sama rata mengikut nisbah pembangkang dan kerajaan.
Syabas dan tahniah diucapkan kepada Menteri Penerangan Malaysia, Dato Ahmad Shabery Chik , seorang pemimpin muda UMNO yang telah berani menyahut cabaran pihak pembangkang. Beliau telah sekali gus membuktikan kepada para sceptics yang menjangkakan beliau akan diratah mentah-mentah oleh Anwar sama sekali tidak benar dan meleset.
Malahan jika kita lihat beberapa kali Anwar tergamam dan tidak menjawab langsung perkara yang dibangkitkan oleh Menteri Penerangan kita terhadap beliau. Apabila Datuk Ahmada Shabery Chik merujuk kepada fakta sejarah perihal pentadbiran Anwar sewaktu menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan Malaysia dahulu yang mengakibatkan banyak syarikat bumiputera kecil dan sederhana(SMI) gulung tikar-Anwar lansung tiada jawaban dan mendiamkan diri dalam isu itu.
Anwar kerapkali mengatakan bahawa kecaman terhadap corak pentadbiran dan polisi beliau dahulu adalah sebagai personal attacks. Walhal, Ahmad Shabery Chik sekadar merujuk kepada ciri-ciri kepimpinan beliau yang mentadbir negara ketika itu dan di khuatiri masih di tahap yang sama dan jika berjaya menubuhkan kerajaan akan bersifat seperti dulu juga.
Saya merujuk kepada sebuah e-mail yang saya terima tadi iaitu komentar mengenai isu dalam debat tersebut di bawah ini:
Apa yang pasti satu sejarah tercipta apabila Menteri Penerangan muda telah berani berdepan dengan bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri yang dipecat dan juga pemimpin de facto PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Debat yang diadakan di Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka dipengerusikan oleh Datuk Johan Jaafar dan dua orang ahli panel - Pengarang akhbar Siasah, Zulkifli Sulong dan Tan Sri Dr.Nordin Kardi, Naib Canselor dari Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Debat yang bertajuk "Bentuk Kerajaan, Esok Akan Turun Harga Minyak". Apa yang dapat diulas disini adalah debat ini sebenarnya tidak mencapai matlamat yang sebenarnya dan bukanlah pula gagal dalam konteks penerangan yang mana debat ini telah diselewengkan dari tajuk asal dimana Anwar tidak fokus kepada isu dan tajuk debat ini yang sebenar. Mungkin bagi pihak pembangkang dan rakyat biasa yang kurang arif dengan subjek teknikal menganggap debat ini berpihak kepada Anwar kerana seperti biasa Anwar telah banyak memutar belitkan fakta sebenar dan berjaya menyusun ayat -ayat yang membayangkan bahawa beliau adalah pejuang kepada rakyat. Dari segi isi sebenar Anwar gagal untuk membuktikan apa yang telah beliau janjikan dan gagal untuk membuktikan bahawa beliau boleh menunaikan janji-janji yang telah dilakukan pada pilihanraya yang lalu.
Anwar dari tajuk sebenar dengan menekan bahawa beliau akan menurunkan harga minyak sebanyak 50 sen. (Lari dari tajuk dan janji beliau pada plihanraya yang lalu) di mana harga minyak pada masa itu adalah RM1.92 jika kita masih mengekalkan harga RM 1.92 maka kerajaan perlu subsidi sebanyak 50 billion yang mana banyak pembangunan terpaksa dihentikan, projek seperti jalan, sekolah terpaksa dihentikan. Anwar banyak merapu dengan mengulangi perkara lama seperti bail out pewaja dan bail out bermacam-macam lagi benda lain yang tidak diterangkan. Selanjutnya>>http://www.kpmu.net
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
PERHIMPUNAN HARAM ATAU DEMONSTRASI?
SAYA DAH kata banyak kali dah. Polis pun dah kata banyak kali. Pak Lah pun dah ingatkan kita semuia banyak kali. JANGAN SERTAI PERHIMPUNAN HARAM!
Kita adalah negara yang berdaulat dan ditadbirkan oleh sebuah kerajaan yang telah melalui proses demokrasi. Semua harus sedar dan insaf bahawa walaubagaimana pahit sekalipun bagi sesetengah golongan orang untuk menelan, terima lah hakikatnya bahawa ini adalah kerajaan BARISAN NASIONAL. Ia di terajui oleh UMNO dan parti-parti komponen yang lain seperti MCA,MIC, PBS,UPKO,SUPP dll
Apa lagi yang tidak senang di hati mereka saya pun kurang arif. Mereka telah berjaya memasukkan wakil-wakil mereka serami 82 orang kedalam Parliamen. Mereka telah ada wakil untuk menyuarakan isihati dan perut mereka di dalam Dewan Rakyat melalui ahli-ahli YB mereka. Namun mereka masih lagi suka untuk pergi ke kawasan lapang dan sepanjang jalanraya untuk menyuarakan keresahan mereka.
Apa yang bertambah pelik dan hairan, turut terlibat dalam perhimpunan-perhimpunan itu juga adalah Ahli Parlimen mereka sendiri. Tidak cukup mereka berhujjah dalam Parlimen nak tambah lagi masa kat luar Parlimen pulak. Mereka juga lah yang menjadi bintang tarikan utam di dalam banyak perhimnpunan tersebut.
Persoalannya: apakah motif sebenar mengadakan demonstrasi jalanan atau perhimpunan haram tersebut sedangkan cara terhormat dan mengikut lunas undang-undang telah sedia ada???
Undang-undang adalah jelas. S.27 (5) Akta Polis 1967 dengan terang menyatakan sebarang perhimpunan yang dihadhiri oleh lebih daripada tiga (3) orang tanpa mendapat kebenaran/permit daripada pihak polis melalui Ketua Polis Daerah kawasan yang berkenaan adalah suatu PERHIMPUNAN HARAM dan merupakan suatu kesalahan jenayah.
S.27(8) Akta Polis 1967 juga menyatakan, mana-mana orang yang didapati bersalah di mahkamah kerana terlibat dengan perhimpunan haram itu boleh dijatuhkan denda tidak kurang daripada dua ribu ringgit(RM2.000) dan tidak lebih daripada sepuluh ribu ringgit (RM10,000) DAN hukuman penjara tidak lebih dari satu tahun.
MAKA adalah teramat jelas dan terang lagi bersuluh seabarang perhimpunan, perjumpaan, mesyuarat taua apa sekalaipun nama yang diberikan tanpa memenuhi syarat undang-undang di atas adalah salah di sisi undang-undang dan boleh dikenakan hukuman.
Mungkin ralai yang tak tahu atau pura-pura tak tahu. Polis belum bertindak lagi. Mereka masih lagi boleh bersabar. Tetapi selpas ini mungkin mereka tidak boleh bersabar lagi. Fikirlah sendiri.
Saturday, July 12, 2008
WE DO IT OUR WAY LAH!
WE DO IT
OUR WAY LAH ! WHEN HE rule this country of ours,god forbid, he can do it HIS own way lah! At the moment let the BN do it their OWN way. This is a democratically elected government through a democratic processvide the 12th General Election of Malaysia on 8th.March,2008.We are puzzled why there are a group of highly specialized people who love take it to the streets shouting, protesting, blaming others, making wild accusations against the present government of the day.Its becoming a weekend activitiy for some quarters to bring along even their young ones,including babies, to participate in such gatherings in the city centre. What they sought to achive by such futile exercise is beneath me, I must say.Prices of food, other merchandise and fuel has gone up is not due to the government`s management of the country. It is global and the entire universe is affected. The YAB Prime Minister, Dato` Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has been managing the country well and please let him steer the good governance of the country so that we may ALL come out of this temporary set back on our feet all square and fair.It is UNFAIR to make demands to the PM to manage the country out of the present inflation whilst at the same time going to the streets making noises and undermining the country`s stability and security. Its a bit like putting a loaded gun at a person`s head and ask him to confess.I have said it many times much earlier. Please do not test the patience of the authorities. The Police has so far been so kind to the people who have been attending and participating in public rallies, gatherings, demonstartions all without proper police permit. The police have not been making arrests which they could easily do if they had been enforcing the law strictly. Just because there have not been any major arrest that does not mean that the public gatherings without proper police permits are legal. They are still considered as illegal assemblies nad anyone participoated or involved may be taking legal action by the Police.Yet again the people can be so nasty and calling names when the police are merely doing their job. The recent investigation by the ACA against Tan Sri Musa Hassan and Tan Sri Ghani Patail on the allegation of corrupt practice by the present advisor of PKR shows that the present government is a transparent adminstration and accountable to the people. However, this does not mean that the government does not have to listen or even dictated by the opposition party.As our YB Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Dato` Seri Syed Hamid Albar said: " When Anwar rule the country, he can do it whatever and how he likes. But until then we rule the country OUR way and will not be dictated by the opposition".
draft
7/
Friday, July 4, 2008
SORONG PAPAN, TARIK PAPAN KA? BALASUBRAMANIAM TARIK BALIK PERAKUAN BERSUMPAHNYA!
APA DAH JADI? APA DAH JADI? JANGAN BETUL KAN PENGHLIHATAN ANDA! BETUL!......DIA DAH BUAT TAPI TARIK BALIK....TAK CAYA KE? EH! LU SENDRI BACALAH:
News update online this morning posted a news that P.Balsubramanim has recently retracted his earlier SD especially those bits alleging our DPM, Dato` Seri Najib Razak of his involvement with the murder case of the late Al-Tantuya Sharibu.
Alhamdulillah, at least Balasubramanim is prepared to tell the true story of what actually happened and while he retracted some but maintain the other remarks he made in the SD
-please read the following related news (taken from NSTonline)
KUALA LUMPUR, Fri:
Private investigator P. Balasubramaniam today retracted all statements that he had made about Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s alleged involvement with Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu in his statutory declaration dated July 1.
“I wish to retract the entire contents of my statuutory declaration dated July 1 2008. I was compelled to affirm the said statutory declaration under duress,” he said in his new statutory declaration dated today.Speaking through M. Arulampalam, a lawyer who accompanied him at the news conference, Balasubramaniam told the reporters that the statements contained in his previous statutory declaration were inaccurate and not the truth.
The new statutory declaration states:
“I wish to expressly state that at no material time did (Abdul) Razak (Abdullah) Baginda inform me that he was introduced to Altantuya Shaaribu by a VIP and at no material time did Razak Baginda inform me that Datuk Seri Najib had a sexual relationship with Altantuya Shaaribu and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.“At no material time did Razak Baginda inform me that Datuk Seri Najib instructed Razak Baginda to look after Altantuya Shaaribu as he did not want her to harass him since he was the Deputy Prime Minister;
“At no material time did Razak Baginda and or Altantuya Shaaribu inform me that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, together with Razak Baginda and Altantuya Shaaribu, had met and all been together at a dinner in Paris;“At no material time did Altantuya Shaaribu inform me that she wanted money in the sum of US$500,000 as a commission for a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris;“At no time whatsoever did Razak Baginda and/or Altantuya Shaaribu inform me that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak met with Altantuya Shaaribu in Singapore;“At no time whatsoever did Altantuya Shaaribu inform me that she wanted me to arrange to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak;“At no time did I tell the police during the course of their investigations about any relationship between Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and Altantuya Shaaribu as no such relationship existed to my knowledge. Accordingly, the statement I signed before the police is complete;“At no time did Razak Baginda inform me that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib an SMS the evening before he was arrested; and “At no time did Razak Baginda inform me that Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had sent him an SMS on the day of his arrest to the effect that he was going to see the IGP (Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan) that day and that the matter should be resolved and for Razak Baginda to remain calm."Yesterday, Najib reiterated that that he never knew Altantuya and referred to the claim linking him with the murdered Mongolian woman as “a terrible lie”.Najib described this latest attempt to connect him to the crime as a“malicious, slanderous fabrication aimed at tarnishing my image.”
MY NENEK ada pesan dulu but I must qoute her in Negeri Sembilan dialect lah baru sodap:
" Lain kali , kalau nak cakap...ngango dulu......"
sobab eh :
" Terlajak perahu boleh di tarik, terlajak bayar ansuran....nanti kena repossess....."
Leia Mais…
SD,SD,SD -WHAT IS A STATUTORY DECLARATION?
WELL.WELL,WELL, if anything, the newspapers are full of stories of STATUTORY DECLARATIONS made by certain quarters whose obsession now seems to be producing SDs(statutory declarations). Perhaps they are going for the record, you can never tell. We might just get to awarded a place in the World Guiness Book of Record for the most rapid number of SDs produced in a single case!
Just what is a statutory declaration? Apakah dia Perakuan Bersumpah? I a hanyalah suatu kenyataan bertulis oleh mana-mana orang mengenai sebarang perkara atau peristiwa. Kenapa dan untuk apa orang itu membuatnya? Hanya orqang itu sahaj lah yang tahu. Jika mahu dibuat maka tiada siap pun boleh melarang. Bahasa dalam Akta 13 di bawah ini adalah jelas.
May be some of us are too busy to do some research. Just refer to a copy of the
STATUTORY DECLARATIONS ACT 1960,Act 13 below:
An Act to provide for the making (and taking) of statutory declarations
and for purposes connected with it and incidental to it.
[Peninsular Malaysia—1 June 1961, L.N. 154/1961;
Sabah and Sarawak*—1 January 1969, P.U. 488/1968]
Short title
1. This Act may be cited as the Statutory Declarations Act 1960.
Form of declaration
2. It shall be lawful for any Sessions Court Judge, Magistrate,
or Commissioner for Oaths or, subject to section 4 of the Notaries
Public Act 1959 [Act 115], any notary public appointed under the
Notaries Public Act 1959, to take and receive the declaration of
any person voluntarily making the same in Malay or English in the
form in the Schedule.
False declaration punishable under Penal Code
3. Declarations made by virtue of the provisions of this Act
shall be deemed to be such declarations as are referred to in
sections 199 and 200 of the Penal Code [Act 574].
Fees
4. A person making any declaration by virtue of the provisions
of this Act shall pay to the officer or Commissioner taking the
same such fees as the Minister may from time to time by
notification in the Gazette prescribe.
SCHEDULE
[Section 2]
In Malay
BORANG AKUAN
Saya,............................................................................... dengan sesungguh
dan sebenarnya mengakui bahawa..........................................................dan
saya membuat akuan ini dengan kepercayaan bahawa akuan ini benar, serta
menurut peruntukan Akta Akuan Berkanun 1960.
Diperbuat dan dengan sesungguhnya diakui oleh
yang tersebut namanya di atas ............................. di............................................................................
di Negeri ...............................................................pada.......................................................................
................................................................, 20 ........
Di hadapan saya,
............................................
(Tandatangan Hakim
Mahkamah Sesyen, Majistret
atau Pesuruhjaya Sumpah)
Statutory Declarations
In English
FORM OF DECLARATION
I,..............................................................do solemnly and sincerely declare
that..................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
and I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be
true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1960.
Subscribed and solemnly declared by the abovenamed
......................................................................................at...................................................................................
in the State of ..............................................................this....................................................................,
20......
Before me,
....................................................
(Signature of Sessions Court Judge,
Magistrate or Commissioner
for Oaths)
Itulah dia rupa dan bentuk Perakuan Bersumpah atua lebih glamour lagi dikenali dengan SD(statutory declaration) Betul! Sesiapa saje boleh datang dan buat suatu SD. Tapi ingat, kalau SD itu didapati palsu atau sengaja diada-adakan mengenai isikandungannya maka orang yang membuatnya boleh dikenakan tindakan pendakwaan jenayah di bawah S.199 dan S.200,Kanun Keseksaan or Penal Code. Pembuat SD itu juga jika didapati bersalah boleh dihukum sama seperti orang yang membuat atau memberi keterangan palsu kepada mahkamah dan boleh dihukum dibawah S.193 Kanun Keseksaan iaitu hukuman penjara maksima tiga tahun dan denda.
The latest yesterday was another SD made against our beloved Deputy Prime Minister, Dato` Seri Najib and his wife , Datin Seri Rosmah,alleged to be linked to the Al-Tantuya murder case. As we have seen yesterday in the news on TV our Deputy Prime Minister have strongly rejected and denied such while and crazy allegation to be baseless and out to smear the good name of our DPM and wife and the entire government led by our beloved Prime Minster, Dato` Seri Abdullah Hj Ahmad Badawi.
Even the DPM`s staff in not safe from being implicated.The picture of the the DPM`s staff was posted in the internet who was seen standing next to the complainant, Saifufl Bukhari Azlan, in an allegation of sodomy against Anwar Ibrahim made by Saiful in his SD . Some tabloids started some wild stories that the staff was one of the person involved in the conspiracy levelled against Anwar.
The poor staff was puzzled over such wild aspersions and indeed highly scandalous inuendos suddenly became another point of attack. I believe we shld all stop making our speculation and indeed stop making uncessary and baseless SDs and led the Police get on with their professiona investigation into the allegation.
I believe the Police will discharge their duties most professionally given their years of training and expertise.
Thursday, July 3, 2008
PEMBETULAN FAKTA-YB DATO` ISMAIL SABRI YAKCOB,MENTERI BELIA DAN SUKAN MALAYSIA
HEBOH SEMALAM, dalam semua media elektronik dan akhbar bahawa ada 4 orang UMNO akan sertai PKR dan dua daripadanya adalah Menteri kabinet sekarang.
BETUL KE? FAKTA ATAU AUTA??
Tersibar luas dalam media elektronik terutamanya mendakwa YB Menteri Belia dan Sukan, iaitu Dato` Ismail Sabri Yakcob dan Timbalan Menteri Pembangunan Usahawan dan Koperasi, iaitu Dato` Saifudin Abdullah telah bersedia untuk mengorak langkah dan hanya menati waktu yang sesuai saje.
Rupa-rupa nya itu semua hanyalah khayalan dan dongengan pihak lawan yangamat cemburu dengan keamanan dan keteguhan pentadbiran sekarang BN dibawah YAB Perdana Menteri kita dan Presiden UMNO, Dato` Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Semalam juga kedua-dua tokoh tersebut telah membuat press conference dan menafikan sekeras-kerasnya berita tersebut sebagai pembohongan dan firnah pihak lawan yang telah kehabisan modal dan politik murahan/picisan.
Saya mengambil peluang ini untuk berkongsi sedikit pengalaman saya bersama YB Menteri Belia dan Sukan Malaysia kita, iaitu Dato` Ismail Sabri Yakcob. Saya berpeluang melanjutkan pelajaran ke Fakulti Undang-Undang, Universiti Malaya,Kuala Lumpur bersama dengan Dato` Ismail Sabri ketika itu. Walaupun beliau adalah satu tahun senior saya, tetapi kami telah berkenalan dan menjadi sahabat baik. Ini disebabkan sifat semula jadi Dato` Ismail yang suka bersahaja dan berterus terang dalam segala isu dan interaksi harian kami tanpa memilih bulu dan darjat.
Sebagaimana yang saya kenali UB Dato Ismail Sabri amay senang berbincang dengan sesiap sahaja dan mudah mesra denagn kawan dan lawan. Beliau memang tak suka banyak birokrasi dan "action dan result oriented" . Lantaran itulah agaknya kami boleh bekerja dengan begitu baik dan rapat dalam kabinet beliau ketika Dato` Ismail telah menjadi Presiden, Persatuan Mahasiswa Universiti Malaya atau PMUM dalam bahasa Inggeris dipanggil "University Malaya Student Union(UMSU) ketika itu.
YB Dato` Ismail telah di pilih menjadi Presiden setelah kami memenangi Pilihanraya Kampus UM peringkat Umum dan Fakulti. Ketika itu saya telah dilantik menjadi Timbalan Setiausaha Agung dan bekerja rapat dengan Presiden dalam banyak urusan.Tema kami ketika pentadbiran beliau adalah menjalankian aktiviti bagi siswa/siswi dan memperjuangkan kebajikan pelajar disamaping perihatin denagn keadaan sekliling/masayarakat termasuklah dalam dan luar negara.
Saya amat bangga keran ketika tiu kabinet belaiu terdapat berbagai bangsa dan fahaman agama iaitu Melayu, Cina dan India. Masing-nasing memegang portfolio penting bagi menjayakan amanh yang telah diberikan oleh para pengundi/pelajar ketika itu.pasukan kami telah berjaya memenangi pilihanraya ketika itu dan mengalahkan pasukan yang dikatakan "favourite" tetapi extrreme pro ke seblah sana. Jelas mereka telah tidak diterima oleh pengunidi/pelajar dan kami menang besar.
Sepanjang pergaulan kami saya berani mengatakan bahwa YB Dato` Ismail Sabri tidak pernah berqiblatkan atau memberi sokongan apa pun kepada kepimpinan Anwar Ibrahim ataupun kumpulannya. Walaupun ketika itu ada suatu gelommbang besar yang digelar "Anwarion" sedang melanda semua kampus di tanahair namun PMUM ketika di bawah YB Dato` Ismail Sabri tidak pernah ada membuat hubungan lansung dengan Anwar Ibrahim dengan apa cara sekalipun.
Kami tetap dengan agenda kami dan mengutamakan kepentingan kebajikan siswa/siswi tanpa mengambil kesempatan terhadap para sisw/siswi yang "fresh" dan masih pening lalt dek "cultural shock"/kejutan budaya kampus.
Lain pula halnya, dengan sesetengah pihak yang mengambil kesempatan kemasukan pelajar baru dengan mengedarkan risalah/nota/surat beracun/fitnah keapda semua pelajar baru ketika Minggu Haluansiswa. Kebanyakan nya adalah menjadi ejen parti politik yang berbau perkauman,extremist dan anti-kerajaan. Kita juga lebih mementingkan isu semasa dan alam sejagat.
Saya masih teringat lagi bagaimana Dato`Ismail mengajak saya pergi mengadap Naib Canselor UM ketika itu, Prof.Di Raja Ungku Aziz kerana ingin memohon kebenaran mengadakan Perhimpunan Besar-besaran di Dewan Tunku Canselor(DTC) bagi mengecam dan memprotes kezaliman regim zionis yang menyerang dan membunuh beribu rakyat di Shartila dan Sharbila, Lebenon. Pak Ungku telah memberi sokongan padu dan meluluskan serta-merta penggunaa DTC dan segala kemudahan. Kami telah berjaya mendapatkan kehadhiran hampri semua Keduataan asing di Kuala Lumpur, wakil NGO Islam dan bukan Islam seluruh Malaysia bagi mengencam regim zionis Israel itu.Pada kami itu adalah aktiviti pelajatr yang amat sihat keran peka dengan keadaan dunia dan lestari kita yang global.
Mengimbau kembali kenangan tersebut dan hakikatnya sekarang adalah mustahil, bagi pandangan saya, bahawa YB Dato` Ismail Sabri yang jug seorang Menteri Kabinet kerajaan Barisan Nasional mahu melompat dan menyertai Anwar/PKR. Saperti kata petikan dalam wawancara semalam oleh YB Dato` Ismail " Ini semua kerje orang GILa! tak masuk akal dan tidak asas sekali!"
Mungkin pihak yang membuat laporan itu sengaja atau tersalah orang! Kredibiliti sumber berita tersebut pun amat musykil sekali. Tak pelah YB Dato`, sabar ajelah.
Selamat meneruskan perjuangan dan menjalankan tugas.
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
AN WARS vs SODOMY ! PART 2
Ever since news of DSAI`s sodomising the young man in blue shirt was posted all over intrnet as well other media sources I have been asked by many friends, neighbours, mamak stall, mak cik nasi lemak seller, insurance men, bankers, security guards etc....the million dollar question i.e : Whether DSAI does indulge in such practice viz a viz homosexual activities?
I must confess I do not know. I say this because I was never there when it happened or if it ever did happened. However, we should give him the benefit of the doubt and let the police do their professional job and if possible, co-operate with the police so that a thorough investigation could be completed as soon as possible.
Incidentally, I would like to refer to the judgement of the learned Tun Abdul Hamid Mohamid, Federal Court Judge, who delivered the majority decision of the Federal Court in the case of Dato` Seri Anwar Ibrahim v PP [2004] 3 CLJ 737 at p.788:
" To summarise our judgment, even though reading the appeal record, we find evidence to confirm that the appellants( DSAI) were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen....as a court of law, we may only convict the appellants if the prosecution has successfully proved the alleged offences as stated in the charges beyond reasonable doubt, on admissible evidence and in accordance with established principles of law.......while the testimonies of Dr.Mohd Fadzil and Tun Haniff and the conduct of the first appellant(DSAI) confirm the appellants` involvement in homosexual activities, such evidence does not corroborate Azizan`s story that he was sodomised by both the appellants at the place,time and date specified in the charge.In the absence of the corroborative evidence it is unsafe to convict the appellants on the evidence of an accomplice alone unless his evidence is unusually convincing or for some reason is of special weight which we find it is not.."
There you are. The Federal Court Judges all agreed that DSAI and the other persons did have homosexual activities. However the learned judges found that there was not enough evidence to establish the allegation that the victim (Azizan) was sodomised ( anal sex against his will/consent) by the appellants (DSAI and another). The court had decided that Azizan was an accomplice and therefore his testimonies requires corroboration (support of convioncing nature) in order to secure a conviction. Since there was no corroboration thus the court could not convict DSAI and had to acquit him.
Based on the above, we can safely simplify our undertanding in plain and simple language as such:
1) Was Anwar involved in homosexual activities then? Answer: Yes.
2) Did Anwar sodomised Azizan(the victim) ? Answer: No.
Having read the above, what do you think of the latest allegation of sodomy against DSAI ?
SELAMAT BERFIKIR!
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK-AN WARS vs SODOMY! PART 1
Yes,yes and yes! Jangan betulkan TV anda! Betul it is happening again. Its a bit like watching reruns of old movies and TV series. The celebrated and most well known former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia is back in the headlines of all mahjor news paper, tabloids and internetssssss.
Yet again, SODOMY is the name and calling the bluff is the name of the game. Abundance of questions lingers on the corridoors of informations , inter alia :-
Q.1) Who is the young man allegedly the latest victim of sodomy by Anwar?
Q.2) Was he actually sodomised or was he a consenting partner?
Q.3) Do you think Anwar really did it or has he been framed again by the BN government?
Q.4) Where is the whereabout of the young man currently ?
Q.5) Where is Anwar and why was he not present at HIS own press conference to deny the allegation? (The statement was read out by a party member YB Tn.Sivarasa at the press conference on 28th.June,08)
Q.6) Is Anwar`s life really threatened that he need to seek refuge at the Embassy of Turkey in Kuala Lumpur?
Q.7) Etc.........
Answers:
A.1) The young man, according to informations from most local the net, is Saiful Bukhari Azlan aged 23, a former student of UNITEN. He was very active when he was a student and invovled in many youth and student activities.
A.2) According to the newspaper report, this yound man has already lodged a police report alleging that Dato` Seri Anwar had sodomised him recently at a luxury apartment in the city.
A.3) Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) issued an offcial statement refuting the allegation as baseless and a conspiracy by the BN government to disparage and defame the reputation of DSAI again-a repeat of 1998.
A.4) It is presently unknown as to the whereabouts of the young man. The last was heard of him when he was sent for medical examination at one of hospitals in Kuala Lumpur and is undergoing treatment.
A.5) The party spokesperson explained that DSAI was too busy answering telephone calls that he was unable to attend his own press conference.
A.6) YB.Dato` Seri Dr.Rais Yatim met the representative of Turkish Embassy in Kuala Lumpur yesterday afternoon on the same issue. He was informed that the Turkish government had never invited DSAI to come to the embassy and that DSAI came of his own accord and claimed that his life was threatened. Today, it was informed DSAI had left the embassy.(Perhaps to another embassy?)
A.7) Also etc..........( Nabil kata: Lu pikir la sendiri !)
Monday, June 30, 2008
Social Contract and Malay Dominance or Kontrak Sosial dan Ketuanan Melayu.
Alhamdulillah I am back in office after one entire week of leave. Leave is good. It refreshes a person and recharges his energy and batteries. Nonethless, after three days at home, I must say I got a bit fed up and miss my office. So her am I back in the comfort and ambience of my belovewd place of work, Faculty of Law, UiTM!!!! Yes we ar3e the pride of the MALAYS AND BUMIPUTRAS...and the envy of the nons.
On this note I must relate and convey here for all of you bloggers and readers about my experience attending a particular forum organised by Bar Council of Malaysia on 28th.June,08 last Saturday. The venue: Auditorium, Bar Council Malaysia, Leboh Pasar,K.L. Time: 9:00 am
Title: The Social Contract.
The speakers ( in order of appearance) : 1)Dr.Marvis Puttucherry ( inter alia, a Fellow at IKMAS,UKM ) ; 2) Dr. Kua Kia Soong ( former opposition party MP and currently runs a private college) ;3) Mr.Timothy Thomas ( Bar Council rep ); 4) Dr.Farish Noor ( a Malay by birth and Malaysian citizen, currently works in Singapore)
The theme of the forum was to discuss the justification of the existence of the Social Contract or Kontrak Sosial which formed the basis of our existence by our founding fathers as a Malaysian nation despite our different and variety of ethnic backgrounds headed by the Malays who is represented by UMNO.
1) Dr.Marvis Puttucherry: This lady who has the privilege and honour of being appointed and serving at IKMAS,UKM being one of the oldest and most reputable national university in Malaysia certainly has her historical accounts distorted or perhaps deliberately distorted it rather intentionally. Little does she know, I hope, that UKM itself was set up by the Malays who went around the country and collected donations from poor Malay kampung folks to set a trust fund in view of setting up an institution using Malay language capable of championing and giving the poor Malays of some hope of quality tertiary education in its own home land as the Malays were then clearly far behind from other ethnic group in tertiary education.
a) Dr.Puttuchery submitted in her opening remarks, I believe she actually believed it, that the "so-called Social Contract" as claimed by the Malays and UMNO never existed in Malaysia. This is because,according to her, "there was never a nation wide consensus as required by a proper social contract" for its existence.
b) She further submitted, what is contained in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia 1957 in relation to Malay privileges and Malay Rulers were an extension of the earlier Anglo-Malayan Agreement between the British and the Malay Rulers only. ( so no consultation with other races)
c) She claimed, that the notion of "social contract" was deliberately later introduced to gain popular acceptance amongst the already multi-ethnic society of Malaysia.
d) Dr.Puttucherry also refrred to the concept of "power sharing" in terms of political positions like Cabinet ministerial post which manifested the agreement by the then Allied Government or Perikatan(UMNO,MCA and MIC) in Peninsula Malaya. That led to Chinese Chief Minster of Penang, Malay Governor in Melaka and an Indian cabinet minister.This was also extended when Sabah and Sarawak joined Malaysia in 1963 when Donald Steven became Chief Minister of Sabah and Stephen Kalong Ningkan Chief Minster of Sarawak.
e) Having outlined those historical facts, Marvis immediately contradict herself by claiming that those power sharing was actually a result of UMNO`s dominance due to citizenship laws accorded to non Malays.In other words, UMNo used the citizenship factor as a bargaining chip for non-Malays to toe the line of UMNO as the leader.
f) Marvis argued that after the 1969 racial riots, UMNO exploited the incident by introducing a series of Constituional amendments which, she strongly claimed, was de;liberately done to maintain UMNO`s dominance.
g) In fact she said that the "Social Contract" was manipulated by UMNO as a "smoke screen" maintain UMNO`s malay dominance in Malaysian politics. She believes that otrher races was merely following blindly whatever UMNO`s doing without challenging nor quiring at any one of them.
h) Marvis appealed to the present Pakatan Rakyat which controls five states in Peninsula Malaysia to change such " narrow and dilapidating laws and procedures" carved out by UMNO to give more equility to other ethnic groups in Malaysia. She believes that these actions by UMNO had tremendously reduced other races right down the level of decadence justified by the laws passed by the UMNO led government.
i) Of course she ended by connecting to the issue of Human Rights in Malaysia for other ethinc groups.She claims that our Human Rights problem is so terrible especially for non Malays under the present UMNo led government.
2) Dr.Kua Kia Soong: This person`s opening remark certainly tell us everything we need to know of the person. He said, with no apologies whatsoever, that: " Social contract in Malaysia is a figment of imagination of political carpet beggars!"
a) Kua referred to several accounts of history from second world war and post world war, development of small industries by the chinese in a very small scale then as opposed to the British/whites in Malaya
b) Kua claimed that the Malay Elite ( instead of using the word UMNO) never opposed the Malayan Union and its contents! He believes that UMNO ( Malay Elite) and other " Malay Hoodlums" was only against the style or manner in which the British approached the Malay Rulers as "bullying the Malay Rulers". Other than that Kua said that UMNO and Malay Rulers welcome the Malayan Union and the Malays wants the British to stay on and briong back British justice to Malaya to ensure poeace and harmony.
c) Kua claimed( like Marvis above) that the British only consulted the Malay Elite and not the Malay masses and other ethnic race in Malaya then and as a result the laws on citizenship was tightened from 5 to 15 years. He further calimed that this is shown in the present Ministry of Higher Learning policy not to allow formation of any college or university using Mandarin or Tamil language as medium of instruction. However, the government is more than ready to allow university/college to use English or Arabic.
d) On New Economic Policy: Kua has got nothing good at all to say about this. He even claimed that all steps taken by the government to maintain law and order and improve of New Economic Policy is seen as "Fascist Trend"!
e) On Qouta of Malay/Bumiputra in education places: Kua claimed that by 1990( wondered where he got it from?) almost on average 90% of scholarship/loans go to malay candidates
f) He even managed to find time and mention about my place of employment-UiTM: He argued that with brances all over Malaysia inclusive of Sabah and Sarawak UiTM has a student population of over 100,000 not a single place is given to non-Malays/Bumiputra. This is a very racsit trend-so he claims.
Suffice to say, I would urge all Malays/Bumiputra not to have anything to do with this person as he apparently dislikes and detest us Malays and Bumiputras. I beleieve he should be kept away from all law abiding citizen of Malaysia. It is frightening to hear such scandalous and seditious remarks made a person holding a Ph.D from Manchester University,UK going around in public, in Malaysia, inciting racial hatred against Malays/Bumiputras.
3) Mr.Timothy Thomas:
I must say, he is the fairest of them all!!!! I am not saying this because I am also a lawyer by training and therefore I am bias for him. Its perhaps due to our training that we are more objective and sensitive to the feelings of other ethnic groups in the audotorium and in Malaysia at large. His choice of words and teriminology invoked was very well acceptable and very fair to everybody. He narrated the accounts of historical facts with zest and correctness. He did not exagerate nor did he ever selectively looses his memory of events as did the other two earlier speakers.
T.Thomas most memorable quote: " Just because we do not have an acceptable definition of what constitute a social contract, that does not mean the doctrine of social contract does not exist in Malaysia....Its a bit like democracy...no one can ever formulate an acceptable definition to everybody but the doctrine is being and has been upheld in many countries in the world."
4) Dr.Farish Noor:
All I can say that this Malay born Malaysian guy who holds a Ph.D to his name should join politics and as he claimed that in the recent General Election, "even this microphone can win the election..,.other than UMNO..." He even referred to the accronym A.B.U as "Asalkan Bukan UMNO" can win the election-just to show how much the people no longer has trust and loyalty to UMNO led government.
Farish a made a very silly analogy, truely unacceptable for someone who holds a Ph.D ( I dont know where from,Manchester may be?) He said:
" I was not there when they formulated the Federal Constitution! I was never a part of it! I was never consulted over it! Therefore why should I be bound what those people have discussed or agreed! I was never a privy to the entire exercise! I do not accept such social contract!"
I suppose Dr.Farish also do not want to obey any laws that was passed and implemented long before he was born and long before he was able to be competent enough to be consulted upon. I suggest, based on such argument, he should go elsewhere where he will always be consulted before the government does anything.
So, ladies and gentlemen that was my humble report and understanding of the said forum.Thankyou.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
CORRECT1 CORRECT! CORRECT!
Dearest friends,
Yes correct. I said friends. That is correct. I never said otherwise. Though some may have some idea what its all about ,equally some may have no idea at all. Apparently, from what was reported from the news, it started one evening when a client visited his lawyer friend, VK.Lingam, at his residence and the latter began to have a lively and loud conversation. It turned out that the client`s son was in attendance and he decided to record the conversation.
The news also reported that it contained allegations of judgement fixing and also fixing of appointment of High Court judges, promotion to senior judicial office etc. It alleges that VK.Lingam was speaking to someone in authority who could fix all tose things alleged.
The govt of malaysia decided to convene a Royal Commission which has deliberated. It has interviewed many people. Their statements have been compiled and a report has been completed. It will be presented before the YDP Agong soon.
Subsequently the report would be made public,as suggested by its chairman, Tan Sri Haidar, former Federal Court Judge. The recommendations contained in the report would be ineteresting to note. Many are aware that prominent figures ahs been called to give statements during the deliberation of the Royal Commission.
The entire nation awaits for the publication of the report.
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Amat sukar berkata benar!
Welcome to my blog!
Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to extend my most heartfelt grattitude to my humble novice blog. I must admit I so humbled by the tremendous magnanimous bloggers around the glob who has statred far,far,far advance ahead of time than an ignorant person as myself. Nonetheless, its better late than never and better to love and lost than not to love at all.
So let me briefly explain about this blog. I am a criminologist and victimologist by profession. Thus I am very concern with related things to criminology and victimology. I am also trying to propagate the science of victimology in my part of the world, particularly, Malaysia.
Victimology is the extension of criminology but its focus is centralised on the victims of dispute/disagreement/hostility between two parties. The focus may begin on the premise of victims of crime generated/committed/inflicted by individuals or institutions. It may also extend later on to victims of abuse of power or natural disaster/catastrophy.
In the present setting of our adminstartion of criminal justice which had been inherited by our colonial masters viz a viz the British, Malaysia should wake up and review the scenario that we have been living. It is timely that after 50 years of Independence we are still very much clinging on to the British apron, one which they themselves have transformed tremonsdusly.
So I hereby welcome you out there to my humble blog. Thanyou, Xie xie ni, rembu nandri, Domo arigato, Merci, Shukran, Dunker, Grazias etc
